The forgotten coup – and how the godfather rules from Canberra to Kiev, by John Pilger

Washington’s role in the fascist putsch against an elected government in Ukraine will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore the historical record. Since 1945, dozens of governments, many of them democracies, have met a similar fate, usually with bloodshed.

Nicaragua is one of the poorest countries on earth with fewer people than Wales, yet under the reformist Sandinistas in the 1980s it was regarded in Washington as a “strategic threat”. The logic was simple; if the weakest slipped the leash, setting an example, who else would try their luck?

The great game of dominance offers no immunity for even the most loyal US “ally”. This is demonstrated by perhaps the least known of Washington’s coups – in Australia. The story of this forgotten coup is a salutary lesson for those governments that believe a “Ukraine” or a “Chile” could never happen to them.

[Please click below to continue reading]

Australia’s deference to the United States makes Britain, by comparison, seem a renegade. During the American invasion of Vietnam – which Australia had pleaded to join – an official in Canberra voiced a rare complaint to Washington that the British knew more about US objectives in that war than its antipodean comrade-in-arms. The response was swift: “We have to keep the Brits informed to keep them happy. You are with us come what may.”

This dictum was rudely set aside in 1972 with the election of the reformist Labor government of Gough Whitlam. Although not regarded as of the left, Whitlam – now in his 98th year – was a maverick social democrat of principle, pride, propriety and extraordinary political imagination. He believed that a foreign power should not control his country’s resources and dictate its economic and foreign policies. He proposed to “buy back the farm” and speak as a voice independent of London and Washington.

On the day after his election, Whitlam ordered that his staff should not be “vetted or harassed” by the Australian security organisation, ASIO – then, as now, beholden to Anglo-American intelligence. When his ministers publicly condemned the Nixon/Kissinger administration as “corrupt and barbaric”, Frank Snepp, a CIA officer stationed in Saigon at the time, said later: “We were told the Australians might as well be regarded as North Vietnamese collaborators.”

Whitlam demanded to know if and why the CIA was running a spy base at Pine Gap near Alice Springs, ostensibly a joint Australian/US “facility”. Pine Gap is a giant vacuum cleaner which, as the whistleblower Edward Snowden recently revealed, allows the US to spy on everyone. In the 1970s, most Australians had no idea that this secretive foreign enclave placed their country on the front line of a potential nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Whitlam clearly knew the personal risk he was taking – as the minutes of a meeting with the US ambassador demonstrate. “Try to screw us or bounce us,” he warned, “[and Pine Gap] will become a matter of contention”.

Victor Marchetti, the CIA officer who had helped set up Pine Gap, later told me, “This threat to close Pine Gap caused apoplexy in the White House. Consequences were inevitable… a kind of Chile was set in motion.”

The CIA had just helped General Pinochet to crush the democratic government of another reformer, Salvador Allende, in Chile.

In 1974, the White House sent Marshall Green to Canberra as ambassador. Green was an imperious, very senior and sinister figure in the State Department who worked in the shadows of America’s “deep state”. Known as the “coupmaster”, he had played a central role in the 1965 coup against President Sukarno in Indonesia – which cost up to a million lives. One of his first speeches in Australia was to the Australian Institute of Directors – described by an alarmed member of the audience as “an incitement to the country’s business leaders to  rise against the government”.

Pine Gap’s top-secret messages were de-coded in California by a CIA contractor, TRW. One of the de-coders was a young Christopher Boyce, an idealist who, troubled by the “deception and betrayal of an ally”, became a whistleblower. Boyce revealed that the CIA had infiltrated the Australian political and trade union elite and referred to the Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerr, as “our man Kerr”.

In his black top hat and medal-laden mourning suit, Kerr was the embodiment of imperium. He was the Queen of England’s Australian viceroy in a country that still recognised her as head of state. His duties were ceremonial; yet Whitlam – who appointed him – was unaware of or chose to ignore Kerr’s long-standing ties to Anglo-American intelligence.

The Governor-General was an enthusiastic member of the Australian Association for Cultural Freedom, described by Jonathan Kwitny of the Wall Street Journal in his book, ‘The Crimes of Patriots’, as, “an elite, invitation-only group… exposed in Congress as being founded, funded and generally run by the CIA”. The CIA “paid for Kerr’s travel, built his prestige… Kerr continued to go to the CIA for money”.

In 1975, Whitlam discovered that Britain’s MI6 had long been operating against his government. “The Brits were actually de-coding secret messages coming into my foreign affairs office,” he said later. One of his ministers, Clyde Cameron, told me, “We knew MI6 was bugging Cabinet meetings for the Americans.” In interviews in the 1980s with the American investigative journalist Joseph Trento, executive officers of the CIA disclosed that the “Whitlam problem” had been discussed “with urgency” by the CIA’s director, William Colby, and the head of MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield, and that “arrangements” were made. A deputy director of the CIA told Trento: “Kerr did what he was told to do.”

In 1975, Whitlam learned of a secret list of CIA personnel in Australia held by the Permanent Head of the Australian Defence Department, Sir Arthur Tange – a deeply conservative mandarin with unprecedented territorial power in Canberra. Whitlam demanded to see the list. On it was the name, Richard Stallings who, under cover, had set up Pine Gap as a provocative CIA installation. Whitlam now had the proof he was looking for.

On 10 November, 1975, he was shown a top secret telex message sent by ASIO in Washington. This was later sourced to Theodore Shackley, head of the CIA’s East Asia Division and one of the most notorious figures spawned by the Agency. Shackley had been head of the CIA’s Miami-based operation to assassinate Fidel Castro and Station Chief in Laos and Vietnam. He had recently worked on the “Allende problem”.

Shackley’s message was read to Whitlam. Incredibly, it said that the prime minister of Australia was a security risk in his own country.

The day before, Kerr had visited the headquarters of the Defence Signals Directorate, Australia’s NSA whose ties to Washington were, and remain binding. He was briefed on the “security crisis”. He had then asked for a secure line and spent 20 minutes in hushed conversation.

On 11 November – the day Whitlam was to inform Parliament about the secret CIA presence in Australia – he was summoned by Kerr. Invoking archaic vice-regal “reserve powers”, Kerr sacked the democratically elected prime minister. The problem was solved.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oceania Saker.


Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on TumblrDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on StumbleUponFlattr the authorShare on RedditPrint this pageShare on LinkedIn

22 thoughts on “The forgotten coup – and how the godfather rules from Canberra to Kiev, by John Pilger”

  1. I remember that time well. The only thing was, I had no idea of the truth about what had happened. I understand now, but I know that far too many Autralians are as ignorant now as I was then. Yes, it was a coup.

  2. What Pilger leaves out is the fact that the Whitlam regime of cultural Marxists was the most hated in Australian history, as manifested by that Labor government’s fate in suffering a hung parliament from the 1974 elections. The US need not have lifted a finger against Whitlam. Otherwise, this article is creditable, and I personally must re-assess my own array of “anti-left” suppositions and delusions. Still, I was interested to read Pilger’s “coup” suggestion in view of the fact that the incumbent Abbott regime is remarkably, almost unprecedentedly obedient to the Evil Empire, as is Canberra’s incumbent Labor Opposition.

  3. Hated by some, including the Murdocracy. Murdoch has been making and breaking Australian governments for nearly half a century.

    “The US need not have lifted a finger against Whitlam.”

    That’s cant that has become received wisdom in the years since the coup.

    The point is there was no reason for Kerr to sack the government on the basis of the hung Senate. It was a political move disguised as a legal stroke.

  4. By what measure does McDonnel deduce the “the fact that the Whitlam regime of cultural Marxists was the most hated in Australian history”.
    What utter rubbish! the only basis in fact I surmise he holds, is his own belief that a liberal minority government was born to rule Australia forever. And the sheer shock of a labour, ( it was inclusive of u then not “Labor”, as now ), taking the power from the conservatives, has left him with a life long trauma.

    He forgets the mass propagandising by the press for Fraser was the key reason in Labour’s loss, coupled with the fact that the incumbent always holds the advantage in the an election. Even if the incumbent was appointed to replace the elected government.

    Rest assured Saker readers, there remain many of us in Australia well aware of the destabilisation of Australian politics and the “quiet coup” in 1975, and that Marshall Green played a key role in it.

    We don’t forget the Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme for affordable medicine in Australia (a worldwide model still despised by big pharma), or access to free education (paid for by our taxes, since stolen back by conservative force), and a raft of other major progressive initiatives Whitlam introduced.

    And please Michael don’t talk about Abott and Shorten like they exemplify Australian grass roots opinion. Even Fraser the American empire’s chosen replacement for Whitlam in the 1975 coup, considers both current sides of politics in Australia as bereft of humanity, and dangerous to a stable world order.

    Take your anti people propaganda where you’ll be more welcome, like Fox News or PBS etc ad infinitum.

    Keep up the good work Saker and John

    1. When the Labor Party was founded it was first called the Labor Electoral League, or the Political Labor League and then the Australian Labor Party. The American spelling of Labor was there from the beginning and only a few journals like the Sydney Morning Herald insisted on the “-our” spelling.
      (Source: Michael Hogan, Ed.: “Labor Pains, Early conference and executive reports of the Labor Party of NSW”, 2006)

  5. The events always had a foul stench and I’ve always pondered how Nations position operatives and sleeper cells in other Nations that can be triggered when and if necessary to destablise a given country. There are CIA manuals, published by WikiLeaks and everyone should be taught the methodologies and the psyops methods used and thus be able to recognise such attempts and defend against them. A Government that did that would be truly protecting the people by empowering them, instead of constantly disempowering them as they attempt to do now..

  6. do you have any proof, or is this just spitballing random uncited names….

    I agree that the events were fishy and it would not surprise me if america was involved, however putting quotations around a sentence means nothing, unless you have proper referencing.

Leave a Reply