Tariq Ali: The Time Is Right for a Palace Revolution, by Chris Hedges

March 06, 2015 “ICH” – “Truthdig” – Tariq Ali is part of the royalty of the left. His more than 20 books on politics and history, his seven novels, his screenplays and plays and his journalism in the Black Dwarf newspaper, the New Left Review and other publications have made him one of the most trenchant critics of corporate capitalism. He hurls rhetorical thunderbolts and searing critiques at the oily speculators and corporate oligarchs who manipulate global finance and the useful idiots in the press, the political system and the academy who support them. The history of the late part of the 20th century and the early part of the 21st century has proved Ali, an Oxford-educated intellectual and longtime gadfly who once stood as a Trotskyist candidate for Parliament in Britain, to be stunningly prophetic.

The Pakistani-born Ali, who holds Pakistani and British citizenships, was already an icon of the left during the convulsions of the 1960s. Mick Jagger is said to have written “Street Fighting Man” after he attended an anti-war rally in Grosvenor Square on March 17, 1968, led by Ali, Vanessa Redgrave and others outside the U.S. Embassy in London. Some 8,000 protesters hurled mud, stones and smoke bombs at riot police. Mounted police charged the crowd. Over 200 people were arrested.

Ali, when we met last week shortly before he delivered the Edward W. Said Memorial Lecture at Princeton University, praised the street clashes and open, sustained protests against the state that erupted during the Vietnam War. He lamented the loss of the radicalism that was nurtured by the 1960s counterculture, saying it was “unprecedented in imperial history” and produced the “most hopeful period” in the United States, “intellectually, culturally and politically.”

[Please click below to continue reading]

“I cannot think of an example of any other imperial war in history, and not just in the history of the American empire but in the history of the British and French empires, where you had tens of thousands of former GIs and sometimes serving GIs marching outside the Pentagon and saying they wanted the Vietnamese to win,” he said. “That is a unique event in the annals of empire. That is what frightened and scared the living daylights out of them [those in power]. If the heart of our apparatus is becoming infected, [they asked] what the hell are we going to do?”

This defiance found expression even within the halls of the Establishment. Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings about the Vietnam War openly challenged and defied those who were orchestrating the bloodshed. “The way that questioning was conducted educated a large segment of the population,” Ali said of the hearings, led by liberals such as J. William Fulbright. Ali then added sadly that “such hearings could never happen again.”

“That [spirit is what the ruling elite] had to roll back, and that they did quite successfully,” he said. “That rollback was completed by the implosion of the Soviet Union. They sat down and said, ‘Great, now we can do whatever we want. There is nothing abroad, and what we have at home—kids protesting about South America and Nicaragua and the contras—is peanuts. Gradually the dissent decreased.” By the start of the Iraq War, demonstrations, although large, were usually “one-day affairs.”

“It was an attempt to stop a war. Once they couldn’t stop it, that was the end,” he said about the marches opposing the Iraq War. “It was a spasm. They [authorities] made people feel there was nothing they could do; that whatever people did, those in power would do what they wanted. It was the first realization that democracy itself had been weakened and was under threat.”

The devolution of the political system through the infusion of corporate money, the rewriting of laws and regulations to remove checks on corporate power, the seizure of the press, especially the electronic press, by a handful of corporations to silence dissent, and the rise of the wholesale security and surveillance state have led to “the death of the party system” and the emergence of what Ali called “an extreme center.” Working people are being ruthlessly sacrificed on the altar of corporate profit—a scenario dramatically on display in Greece. And there is no mechanism or institution left within the structures of the capitalist system to halt or mitigate the reconfiguration of the global economy into merciless neofeudalism, a world of masters and serfs.

“This extreme center, it does not matter which party it is, effectively acts in collusion with the giant corporations, sorts out their interests and makes wars all over the world,” Ali said. “This extreme center extends throughout the Western world. This is why more and more young people are washing their hands of the democratic system as it exists. All this is a direct result of saying to people after the collapse of the Soviet Union, ‘There is no alternative.’ ”

The battle between popular will and the demands of corporate oligarchs, as they plunge greater and greater numbers of people around the globe into poverty and despair, is becoming increasingly volatile. Ali noted that even those leaders with an understanding of the destructive force of unfettered capitalism—such as the new, left-wing prime minister of Greece, Alexis Tsipras—remain intimidated by the economic and military power at the disposal of the corporate elites. This is largely why Tsipras and his finance minister, Yanis Varoufakis, bowed to the demands of European banks for a four-month extension of the current $272 billion bailout for Greece. The Greek leaders were forced to promise to commit to more punishing economic reforms and to walk back from the pre-election promise of Tsipras’ ruling Syriza party to write off a large part of Greece’s sovereign debt. Greece’s debt is 175 percent of its GDP. This four-month deal, as Ali pointed out, is a delaying tactic, one that threatens to weaken widespread Greek support for Syriza. Greece cannot sustain its debt obligations. Greece and European authorities will have to collide. And this collision could trigger a financial meltdown in Greece, see it break free from the eurozone, and spawn popular upheavals in Spain, Portugal and Italy.

The cost of open defiance, which, Ali pointed out, is our only escape route from corporate tyranny, will at least at first be painful. Our corporate masters do not intend to release their death grip without a brutal fight.

Ali recalled that even his late friend Hugo Chavez, the firebrand socialist president of Venezuela, was not untouched by intimidation from Establishment forces. “I remember talking to Chavez many times and saying, ‘Comandante, why do you stop there?’ ” Ali said. “He said it is not realistic to do it at the present time. We can regulate them, make life difficult for capitalism, use oil money for the poor, but we can’t topple the system.”

Ali added, “The Greeks and the Spanish are saying the same.”

“I don’t know what Syriza thought,” he said. “If it thought we can divide the European elite, we can make a big propaganda campaign in Europe and they will be forced to make concessions, that was foolish. This European elite, led by the Germans, doesn’t crack easily. They have walked all over the Greeks. The Greek leaders should have said to their own people, ‘We are going to try and get the best possible conditions—if not we will report to you what has happened and what we need to do.’ Instead, they fell into the European trap. The Europeans made virtually no concessions that mattered.”

The clash between the Greeks and the corporate elites that dominate Europe, Ali said, is “not economic.”

The European Union is “prepared to pour billions into fighting Russians in the Ukraine,” he said. “It’s not a question of the money. They can throw away the bloody money, as they are preparing to do and are doing in the Ukraine. With the Greeks they pretend it is economic, but it’s political. They are fearful that if the Greeks pull it off, the disease will spread. There are elections in December in Spain. If Podemos [Spain’s left-wing party] wins with Greece already having won and proceeding, however modestly, on a different path, the Spanish will say the Greeks have done it. And then there is the Irish waiting patiently with their progressive parties, saying, ‘Why can’t we do what Syriza has done? Why can’t we unite and take on our extreme center?’ ”

Ali said he was “shocked and angry about all the hopes that were invested in Obama by the left.” He lambasted what he called the American “obsession with identity.” Barack Obama, he said, “is an imperial president and behaves like one, regardless of the color of his skin.” Ali despaired of the gender politics that are fueling a possible run for the White House by Hillary Clinton, who would be the first woman president.

“My reply is, ‘So bloody what?’ ” he said. “If she is going to bomb countries and put drones over whole continents, what difference does her gender make if her politics are the same? That is the key. The political has been devalued and debased under neoliberalism. People retreat into religion or identity. It’s disastrous. I wonder if it is even possible to create something on a national scale in the United States. I wonder if it would be better to concentrate on big cities and states to develop some movements where they can have an influence in Los Angeles, New York or in states such as Vermont. It may be wiser to concentrate on three or four things to show that it can be done. I can’t see the old way of reproducing a political party of the left, modeled on the Republican and Democratic structures, as working. These people only work with money. They do not even speak with very many ordinary people. It is credit-card democracy. The left cannot and should not emulate this. America is the hardest nut to crack, but unless it is cracked we are doomed.”

Ali said he fears that should Americans become politically conscious and resist, the corporate state will impose naked forms of militarized repression. Government’s reaction to the 2013 bombings at the Boston Marathon stunned him. Authorities “closed down an entire city with the support of the population.” He said that the virtual declaration of martial law in Boston was “a dress rehearsal.”

“If they can do it in Boston they can do it in other cities,” he said. “They needed to try it on in Boston to see if it would work. That frightened me.”

“The manufacturing of threats manufactures fear,” he said. “It creates sleepwalking citizens. They [officials] never tried to do this on this scale when they were fighting the Soviet Union and the communist enemy, which was supposed to be the worst, most dangerous threat ever. Now they do it over a handful of bloody terrorists.”

Groups such as Black Lives Matter, he said, offer some hope.

“Just as the traditional left parties have been wiped out all over the world, so has the radical segment of the African-American population and their organizations,” he said. “They were physically wiped out. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, some of the most gifted leaders, were assassinated. The Black Panthers were destroyed. Areas where blacks lived on the West Coast were flooded with drugs. It was a well-planned assault. But the young people who came out in Black Lives Matter have this older spirit. When Jesse Jackson went to Ferguson and engaged in demagogy he was heckled. They did the same on the East Coast with [Al] Sharpton. These black leaders, bought off, are being seen for what they are.”

Ali’s deep concern is that organizations such as Black Lives Matter too often react to events and “don’t totally grasp that dealing with this problem of continuous state violence against the citizenry requires political movements.” He worries that Americans lack an understanding of their own history and that very few are literate in basic revolutionary theory, from Karl Marx to Rosa Luxemburg. This illiteracy, he said, means that opposition movements are often unable to effectively analyze the structures and mechanisms of capitalist power and cannot formulate a sophisticated political response.

“Why didn’t the American working class produce a Labour Party or a proper Communist Party?” he asked. “Repression. If you look at … what happened in America in the early decades of the 20th century and the last decade of the 19th century you see that private mercenaries were hired to stop it [political organizing]. This is a history that is not emphasized. This wretched neoliberalism has downgraded the teaching of history. It is the one subject they really hate. Politics they can take up because they use anti-communism. But history is a huge problem. You can’t understand the emergence of Syriza without understanding the Second World War, the role of the partisans, the role of the Communist Party that organized the partisans and how at one point 75 percent of the country was controlled by these partisans. Then the West came and fought a new war, Churchill did it with Truman’s backing, to defeat these people.”

“I was sympathetic to the Occupy movement, but not to the business of not having any demands,” he said. “They should have had a charter demanding a free health service, an end to the pharmaceuticals and insurance companies’ control of the health service, a free education at every level for all Americans. The notion, promoted by anarchists such as John Holloway, that you can change the world without taking power is useless. I have a lot of respect for the anarchists that mobilize and fight for immigrant rights. But I am critical of those who theorize a politics that is not political. You have to have a political program. The anarchists of yore, in Spain, for example, had a real political program. This new type of anarchism achieves nothing. And probably half of these groups are infiltrated. We have the figures of how many FBI people were in the Communist Party and their Trotskyist offspring. There were huge numbers. FBI people were making key decisions.”

Ali said that the failure on the part of citizens to build mass movements to dismantle wholesale surveillance in the wake of the revelations by Edward Snowden was an example of our collective self-delusion and our complicity in our own oppression. The cult of the self, a product of neoliberal corporate propaganda, infects every aspect of society and culture and leads to paralysis.

“Hollywood gave an Oscar to “Citizenfour” and that is as far as it goes,” he said. “As if that matters. That is what is frightening. No civil rights movement has sprung up uniting the citizens against mass surveillance. Neoliberalism has effectively destroyed solidarity and empathy, helped by new technology. It is a culture of narcissism.”

Ali predicted that the current global speculation would result in another catastrophic financial crash. This new crash will give birth to “movements and people who will say, ‘Enough.’ ” If these movements build radical political programs with an alternative socialist vision for society, our “authoritarian capitalism” can be battled, but if this vision is absent, if revolt is simply reactive, things will get worse. The epicenter of this struggle, he said, will be in the United States.

“If nothing happens in the United States, if nothing new is created to challenge systemic excesses and empire, it will be a bad situation for all of us,” he said. “One is doomed if nothing happens in the U.S.”

Source: Information Clearing House

For information about Tariq Ali’s new book, “The Extreme Centre: A Warning,” click here.

Chris Hedges previously spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15 years.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oceania Saker.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on TumblrDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on StumbleUponFlattr the authorShare on RedditPrint this pageShare on LinkedIn

8 thoughts on “Tariq Ali: The Time Is Right for a Palace Revolution, by Chris Hedges”

  1. Such passionate intelligent and hopeless reasoning all based on belief.
    We need more than hope. We need to carry confidence in hope to move forward. Any way forward rests on the recognition that the Left is a product of the Right just as there can be no black without white. The contest between the two is a contrived and dutiful bun fight between Tweedledee and Tweedledum even when the buns contain atom bombs.
    War, meaning killing and dieing, is more fundamental in reality than language, but then peace is more fundamental to reality than war. After all we die in war and we live in peace.
    This is a comment, necessarily short. Those who understand it will recognise that those seeking war have dead minds; are self immolating; are dead before they die; may be rich but are never wealthy or powerful. If forced to war and victory the wise carry funerals home for those they kill.
    This means the military can never be admired other than as a clever or ingenious toy, which whenever it seeks to kill it can only be feared and despised. The military is the lowest form of humanity. In use it reeks of corruption and must be given the place we give all other corruption, meaning it must be buried deep.
    The USA presently stinks of corruption simply because it has a large majority of dead men walking in astonishing prominence. It is almost funny. In short it is a country of oxygen thieves.
    Those with confidence will recognise America’s shame, will not fear them and so have no need of victory. Those in fear will wear medals proudly in their pretense of victory.
    See daodejing. It shows us way or dao, which is ‘forward’ as used above, not another version of God/Devil, White/Black, and the (Anglo-Saxon led) West will simply have to catch up. Do so and be immortal (powerful) even if you die.

  2. A very good, truthful ,analysis of the horror that has befallen the World in this last quarter of a century.I remember at the end of the Cold War thinking, and saying, that we (the people) would suffer from the Soviet collapse. The leaders in the West lived in fear that their own people would turn on them and embrace Socialism.Which is why the few benefits available to the lower and lower middle classes were allowed.Once there was no “other” system to change to.The leaders were totally free of that fear.There was no reason,except morality, (so for them,no reason) to throw any bones to the people in our countries.They were free to intimidate,bribe,and subvert our societies with propaganda.And if you objected,too bad,so what.What were you going to do about it.There was no other model in power to side with.And they knew (know) they could get away with whatever they wanted,and have done so.If you believe in mankind’s ultimate goodness,then my words are meaningless to you.But if you believe,that we need “checks and balances” in society,because history shows us we need them.Then you can see how much the Soviet collapse harmed the “people” of the World.I’m glad to see that Ali seems to agree too.

    Today,our leaders are moving ahead even further.They have debased and looted pretty much all they can from our own
    peoples.And so have moved into attacking Russia,with the ultimate goal of subjecting China ,if they can bring down Russia first.The resources of Russia and the industrial might of China would allow our leaders to dominate the entire Globe for at least another century.The only problem for them is that those countries have the effrontery to object to being enslaved.And in Russia’s case (though the writing is on the wall for China to see) dismembered as well.The building up of a fake ultra-nationalism in Ukraine ,since the Soviet collapse.And those forces teaming up with neo-nazis, struck a nerve among Eastern Ukrainians (and most Russians).Who suffered the worse genocide of their peoples in history from that bunch.So the new “Spanish Civil War” of our times, is a “Ukrainian Civil War”.And just as in the Spanish one, we see most of the West siding with the fascist side.And the Russians playing the role of the old USSR.The only difference is,this one is on Russia’s borders.And is an existential threat to Russia.The same Russia that is one of the two largest nuclear armed powers in the World.What on earth are our “leaders” thinking.Did they actually think that the country that defeated Napoleon and withstood and triumphed over the most bestial force in hundreds of years under Hitler.Was going to stand by,while Hitler’s ideological heirs set up shop in Ukraine,the heartland of Russia’s history.And then started a genocidal Russian-killing in the East of the country. If so,they know nothing of Russians and Russia.

    There is a popular way of writing articles in Russia.That I will use here,”What is to be done”.Well,this article holds part of the answer.The article says the population in the US (read West) must oppose this suicidal path.That’s not easy certainly.Our “leaders” have had everything going their way for years,most would say for centuries.But at no time have “all” of us faced such a threat to our very existence as we do today.There is talk that some of our leaders (the 1%) are quietly building safe areas (safe,they hope) in places like New Zealand,and Argentina.Figuring like I do as well,that if anywhere on earth would be safer it is those regions.I can’t say if the reports are totally accurate or not.But since I also considered those regions.I have to believe big money people have as well.But what about the hundreds of millions, at the very least, of the rest of us.Where is our safe area,there isn’t one for the sheeple. If our leaders push us to war,at the very least Europe,North America,and Russia are gone.Eighty percent of the populations lost is a good estimate at best.Though if the war ignites the Nuclear Winter scientists talk about,eighty percent might become closer to 100%.From an ex-Russian military officer I know.The Russian nuclear command has a list of 338 targets in the US alone (maybe more by today).All neatly marked with satellite coordinates.And since Russia has over 4,000 nuclear weapons many able to split into others for a grand total of around 14,000.Then with the 338 for the US,that still leaves plenty for Europe,Canada,etc.Certainly,the US has an equal number,marked for Russia.Hence,my reference above to the “suicidal” course we are following.And of course that leaves China unaccounted for.China knows that the fall of Russia leaves them alone to face the West.So like any human being facing a bully at school wanting your lunch money.You look to the other tough kid for aid.That is the main basis for the “Russian/Chinese Strategic Partnership” you hear so much about.All the talk from our “leaders” about any splits between Russia and China, run up against that one fact.As long as China has fear of the Western designs on her.They and Russia will be friends.Its a matter of self survival for both parties.

  3. While I have great respect for Tariq, I am afraid that the revolution will NOT take place in the USA – they Militarized Police force is well established and the system of repression, one that the Stazi could only admire.

    The BRICS are leading the couinter revolution and those who are prepared to join them win a degree of political as welll as economic freedom not available under the Empire.

  4. J’ai reçu de Michel Lequenne (m.lequenne@free.fr) le commentaire suivant :
    “Pourquoi, Tariq Ali, oblitères-tu le stalinisme dans

    la responsabilité de la dépolitisation des peuples,

    et limites-tu la complétude du marxisme à Rosa, et

    non à Lénine et Trotsky ?

    C’est pourtant leur seule voie que Chavez et les

    bolivariens se sont refusés à prendre et qui risque

    de les conduire au désastre, ainsi que, maintenant

    Tsipras, et ses homologues en Espagne, au

    Portugal, en Irlande et en France.

    Sans soviets (comités, conseils où quelques nom

    qu’on leur donne) leur centralisation et prise du

    pouvoir, la barbarie vaincra !

    Michel Lequenne.”

    1. Pourquoi, Tariq Ali, oblitères-tu le stalinisme dans

      la responsabilité de la dépolitisation des peuples,

      et limites-tu la complétude du marxisme à Rosa, et

      non à Lénine et Trotsky ?

      C’est pourtant leur seule voie que Chavez et les

      bolivariens se sont refusés à prendre et qui risque

      de les conduire au désastre, ainsi que, maintenant

      Tsipras, et ses homologues en Espagne, au

      Portugal, en Irlande et en France.

      Sans soviets (comités, conseils où quelques nom

      qu’on leur donne) leur centralisation et prise du

      pouvoir, la barbarie vaincra !

      Michel Lequenne.

  5. What I see the people of the US revolting against are GMO’s and vaccines and the environment. Each of these issues are tangically related to corporate America, corruption and then to the capitalist system itself. What is more they affect all people equally, you cannot escape vaccines by moving to the suburbs Indeed you may even become a greater victim to the “system” as these mandatory policies follow the money into school and the work place, it doesn’t take a great leap of the imagination to consider that if the corporations that are supposed to protect and nurture our health are corrupt then what say about the “rest” of the economy. These are two issues that will gain mass traction in the USA and they do have the potential to wipe out the entire corportocracy that is ruining what is left of American democracy. I know it sounds silly but mark my words. Russia and China should pour some money into researching these issues as the fire is already lit what it needs is evidence, oxygen, evidence
    thats being distorted and hidden by the manufacturers of these products and their Boards of Directors interlinked I might add to the rest of the capitalist social order.

Leave a Reply