The major problems for Russia with Ukraine’s new moves to become a major nuclear energy power in Europe (although it recently sold 40% of its leading nuclear organization to “foreign investors” at fire-sale prices) are probably more of a transparency and military nature than a safety or economic one. This is because the pattern of contamination from future nuclear accidents would likely follow the Chernobyl pattern to Europe, which Russia is already distancing itself from by attributing any disaster solely to the supplier of the replacement rods.[i]
True, there are compatibility and reliability problems with fuel rods supplied for Russian and Soviet-era reactors by Westinghouse. In the recent alleged case of the 100-sq.-km atomic contamination in the Ukraine, it’s claimed by some that the zirconium cladding of substitute rods had leaked at the world’s fifth largest nuke power plant—the Zaporozhye facility.[ii],[iii] Those not familiar with nuclear energy may not be aware that a rod just can’t be pulled out and a replacement rod “slapped in”. Putting in a fresh rod requires an exact match, not just with the physical structure but complex calculations relating to the enrichment level of existing rods.[iv]
Under the previous regimen, Russia handled fuel rod reprocessing and waste disposal. Control of the nuclear cycle itself was a safeguard against the eventuality of a regime in Kiev seeking to reinstate itself as an offensive nuclear power just a stone’s throw from Russia.
In the current situation, Ukrainian managers and their Western cohorts will no doubt be tempted to leave rods in the reactor for longer periods due to monetary and political considerations (e.g., desperate attempts to supply energy to the European grid for foreign currency, an inability to get or pay for new rods, a desire to deprive Russia of reactor-supply revenues and an effort to lower power costs.)
However, rods left in for longer periods get hit by more neutrons, hence they get more enriched and can more readily produce a “critical mass” necessary for nuclear fission (so-called “criticality”)[v] risking a Fukushima-like crude explosion, or can themselves serve as a source for fissile materials in a clandestine weapons program.
In plain English, this means rods left in 25% longer than specified will have far higher enrichment to weaponizable material (at least for a crude weapon) meaning there could be a nuclear accident at the reprocessing plant OR the material could be covertly processed and the fissile material extracted for weapons.
Is the possibility of a nuclear armed Ukraine so farfetched? On September 14, 2014, Ukrainian Defence Minister Valery Geletei is reported to have openly stated: “If we cannot protect [Ukraine] today, if the world does not help us, we will have to return to creation of these weapons to protect ourselves from Russia.”[vi]
“Ask yourself: If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination — then WHY would the CDC and the U.S. Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, or at all?”
Quote Attributed to Nana Kwame, Accra, Ghana
In this article, I will endeavor to at least raise questions for further investigation. For simplicity I have made extensive use of endnotes. While mass forced inoculation of potentially dangerous vaccines and the imposition of martial law in the U.S. and NATO are certainly foreseeable long-term outcomes of the current situation, I will leave these for other commentators to speculate on. Also, while the “pandemic” is claimed by many to be a foil for strategic occupation of resource-rich African territory by the U.S./NATO, my treatment of troop deployments only relates to (a) the reality of the epidemic/pandemic and (b) the possibility that countermeasures have been developed to allow troops to operate in a contaminated environment or that this deployment is really a large-scale clinical trial of such Ebola countermeasures.
There is little doubt in my mind that the filovirus agents causing Ebola are real and that they are (or appear to be) making a sudden and unlikely spread after 94 or so years of relative inactivity.[i] However, many in Africa do not believe in the reality of Ebola or blame it on vaccination programs and foreign testing labs in their respective countries.[ii] Dr. Cyril E. Broderick, a Delaware State University (DSU) associate professor has made serious allegations concerning the development of recombinant Ebola-containing strains and their testing on African populations utilizing various labs and NGOs, and alleges experiments by the U.S. DoD.[iii] Reports have also surfaced in Liberia of water sources being poisoned with toxic substances to simulate Ebola symptoms as well as untested “Ebola vaccines” being administered to people with ill effects.[iv]
Is this pure superstition from “darkest Africa”? There have been numerous vaccination programs in the affected regions of Africa. (Some 100-million Africans were immunized against smallpox prior to 1972 when the disease was declared officially eradicated. Massive campaigns by NGOs and governmental agencies have increased numbers of vaccinated (all types) individuals in the Ebola-affected areas from less than 50% in 1990 to greater than 80% in 2010.[v] For varying historical reasons[vi] one could easily posit the existence of man-made live vaccinia smallpox vaccines incorporating key Ebola genes, potentially producing false test positives and Ebola-like symptoms, and covertly administered as part of existing vaccination programs.[vii]
Tom is a shrewd observer,analyst and opinion maker. Read more from behind the lines,behind the editorials abound and ponder on the wider game.
President Obama’s speech announcing war with ISIS has been hailed in the non-mainstream press as a harbinger of war with Syria, paving the way for an assault on Lebanon and Iran. (I would add to that mix the creation of what I call “Israeli Kurdistan” from Iraq and a portion of Turkey[i], dispossession of Palestinians and expulsion of Gaza residents into the Sinai and further expansion of Eretz or greater Israel as the future seat of AngloZionist world government.[ii])
The more farsighted see in Obama’s war announcement and in the ISIS Caliph’s almost simultaneous threats to attack Russia an even more sinister motive of reinstating the Reagan-era mujahedeen and Bush-Clinton-era Chechen state-sponsored terrorism against the former Soviet Union and then Russia. (Not surprisingly, Saudi Arabia, which was heavily involved in funding and proselytizing both of the aforementioned terrorist enterprises, was similarly involved in the creation of ISIS/ISIL.)
While no one has mentioned it, the sheer blatant nature of Mr. Obama’s call for an illegal aggressive war on Syria—without Congressional approval (especially after the 2013 Russian-brokered Syrian peace deal) can be seen as a bare-faced provocation. One rubber stamped by Vice President Kerry. Could the Russians be persuaded to make a bad chess move, sacrificing either Syria or Ukraine?
While the world attention has focused on a race analysis of the shooting in Ferguson, Tom takes a look from a different angle. He diligently backs up his claims with evidence that points to a different motive.
The emergence of the US Police State has been a phenomenon in the making for a while. Each protest and each police response to violence is an opportunity for the state to be either benevolent or vindictive. Scanning US domestic media shows us a curtailing of rights,militarization of police and police brutality on the rise. This unfortunately points towards the latter.
It’s my contention that the alleged race-based police shooting in Ferguson, Mo.. is, in fact, a concoction exploited by politicians and their paid rabble rousers to expand police powers and create a state of quasi-martial-law in the U.S. based on fear in the general population—on one hand—and rage on the part of paid provocateurs, gangs, and easily-misled black citizens.
This is part of an ongoing process of terrorizing the population to accept greater restrictions in return for “saftey”—much as the drug menace was used to create public acceptance for the war on drugs. This war cost people a great deal of personal and financial freedom but failed to solve any of the underlying problems.
Prima facie evidence that, this time around, the general public is skeptical of the Ferguson, Mo./Mike Brown narrative presented by the controlled mainstream media, black “activists”, and the Obama Administration is evidenced by the financial contributions made by the general public. These are running in a nearly 2:1 ratio in favor of the defense of officer Darren Wilson vs. money for Michael Brown’s family. Wilson’s defense fund has raised in excess of $400,000 as of this writing.
Part of this skepticism may be due to the fact that the vast majority of violent interracial crime in the U.S.—more than 80%–is perpetrated against whites. For of the 20% of violent crimes that are interracial, 15% involve black offenders and white victims; 2% involve white offenders and black victims. There is, in fact, an epidemic of such crime fueled by a large number of black youth in the U.S. with below-average IQ’s. Instead of being given vocational training in line with their abilities they are told by educators they cannot compete because of “white racism.” This produces great hostility against whites, the vast majority of whom never did anything to harm blacks or even had a distant ancestor who held slaves. (Much more black crime is directed at other blacks—perhaps indicating a concern of the voters of Ferguson who outnumber white voters by more than 2:1 and could easily have had a mostly black police force if they so desired.)
Whites, in fact, are the victims of systematic official discrimination in work, housing, and education. Many whites do not get a job, get promoted, get subsidized housing or attend the school of their choice because of their race. These benefits go to less-qualified blacks. This is euphemistically called “affirmative action.”
While the large number of blacks in the prison population is held up as an example of race-based justice, the reality is that blacks commit an inordinate amount of crime per capita—whatever the reason. In practice, it is white victims that get the short end of the stick. For instance, in a horrific rape-torture-murder of a white couple in Tennessee several years back, the black perpetrators used the defense that the female victim wanted to be killed this way and had hired them! All got light sentences and the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole is now considering releasing one of these criminals.
In the mid-1990s, the Center for Equal Opportunity analyzed 55,512 felony cases filed in state courts for the 75 largest counties, representing 37% of the U.S. population. The weighted data revealed that juries actually acquit blacks at a higher rate than whites for 12 of the 14 types of crime studied—including murder, rape, robbery and assault. The only category that had a higher conviction rate for African-Americans was felony traffic offenses.
Contrary to the numerous inflammatory public statements claiming Brown was either running away from Officer Wilson with his hands up or on his knees with hands up—shot execution style by the “racist cop (hence the slogan: “Hands up, don’t shoot.”)—Brown was shot all times in the front, with his hands down, and was apparently running towards the officer. The last shot, to the top of his head, was apparently fired as the suspect was falling after the other 5-6 shots had likely failed to stop his charge.
Obviously, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, the media and the outside agitators were well aware that Brown had NOT been shot in the back or kneeling with his hands up as his body was lying in plain view inside the police lines and was likely seen by dozens of eyewitnesses. Yet these people—aided and abetted (by their silence) incitement to riot, which included chants calling for the death of officer Wilson. Ample proof can be seen in the following excerpt from an autopsy of Mike Brown by former NYC Medical Examiner Michael M. Baden (N.Y. Times, Aug. 17, 2014):
There were no wounds on the back or powder burns on Brown’s body, indicating that he had not been shot at close range, execution style. A recently released audio recording of Wilson firing 11 shots in rapid succession does not—as the media indicates—show recklessness. It indicates an officer, in fear of his life, attempting to stop a massive suspect (who had already beaten him, fractured an eye socket, and attempted to take his service revolver.)
While Brown’s alleged accomplice in the assault and robbery of the convenience store—Dorian Johnson–has since recanted his story after the autopsy results were released, several other accounts have surfaced confirming that Brown, a former school football linebacker, turned on the officer and rushed toward him, causing the officer to fire.
A local radio station, KFTK, recently broadcast what is claimed to be the officer’s account of the event as told to his “significant other”.
According to this statement, Brown and his friend Dorian Johnson were walking in the middle of the street, refusing to get out of the street after Wilson asked them to do so. At that point, Wilson got a call about a “strong-arm” robbery, and saw the cigars (a $50 pack of “Tiparillos” cigars) that Brown allegedly stole from a convenience store. When Wilson opened the door to get out of the police car, Brown pushed the door shut and punched Wilson in the face and attempted to get the officer’s sidearm. The gun went off once in the struggle. Brown and Johnson started running away and, following protocol, Wilson pursued them and yelled, “Freeze.” The caller alleges Brown then started taunting Wilson and daring him to shoot. Brown reportedly turned and rushed the cop again.
The aftermath of this event is equally suspect and is fraught with outside agitators, possibly paid gang organizers and suspicious arsons and “spontaneous” gatherings. The latest installment on the Nodisinfo website—which deals with false-flag events—asserts the subsequent fire at the QT convenience store where Brown allegedly stole his cigarillos was staged using pyrotechnics and propane cylinders:
Concludes Nodisinfo: “The use of (a) flare gun is hard proof of the hoax. The QT riots and looting were fully staged. It was not a spontaneous act at all. Rather, it was a pre-planned part of the Ferguson scam known, here, as the Ferguson Martial Law hoax. There was nothing spontaneous about it. Rather, it was all plotted and planned under the auspices of the Zionist-controlled military-police apparatus, with full knowledge and coordination of the Ferguson police force.”
Tom Mysiewicz is best known as the founder and editor of BioEngineering News, first weekly news service covering the biotechnology field from 1980 through 1993. Winner of award for excellence in spot news reporting from Newsletter Association of America (1981).
He has been quoted as an expert on biotechnology in publications such as: Chemical Week, Business Week, The New York Times, The L.A. Times, San Jose Mercury Messenger, the Economist, San Francisco Examiner, Venture Magazine, etc.
For the past 10 years he has devoted himself to a correct (often controversial) analysis of Middle Eastern affairs and is looking with greater interest at Eurasia, where he sees Russia as a necessary counterbalance in a monopolar world, and South America.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Oceania Saker.